Job-Based Health Plan Costs Rise, With Little Relief in Sight

Job-Based Health Plan Costs Rise, With Little Relief in Sight

Rising healthcare costs aren’t a problem just for those who buy their own health insurance. Increases hit employers and their workers this year, too, and more are expected for 2027 plans — adding to growing concerns about affordability heading into the midterm elections.

Polls show that healthcare costs — and affordability, in general — are among top concerns cited by likely voters. Much attention has been focused on mounting costs and declining enrollment in Affordable Care Act plans, the insurance used by roughly 19 million people who buy their own. But work-based plans are adding financial pressure for the more than 150 million Americans covered through their jobs.

One of the biggest changes this year, for instance, came in the amount workers pay toward their own coverage, rising an average of 9% to $7,471 annually for a family, according to a broad annual survey released Oct. 22 by KFF, a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News. That’s up from the 7.6% jump seen from 2024 to 2025.

Their employers, too, faced additional costs, with the average family coverage premium rising 5% to hit $28,303, according to the survey.

In response to that increase — which comes on the heels of a 6% increase the previous year — 44% of large employers, with at least 200 employees, said they upped what workers had to pay toward coverage.

“When we start to see higher use or higher prices, there are only a limited number of things employers can do” to try to slow premium increases, said Matthew Rae, associate director of the Program on the Health Care Marketplace at KFF.

Employers reported taking other actions in the past year to hold down their costs, such as increasing deductibles (the amounts people pay toward their care before insurance pitches in), changing insurers, adding preapproval for some services, or offering workers a narrower choice of healthcare providers, the KFF report said.

Workers’ earnings rose an average of 3.7% this year, the survey found, while overall inflation was 2.7%.

People who work for small companies, with fewer than 200 employees, paid more for healthcare than their counterparts at larger companies.

For example, health plans at large companies had a $1,772 average annual deductible for an individual employee, while small workplaces averaged $2,624.

Overall, though, the share workers pay toward the total premium across all companies ticked up only slightly from the previous year, hitting 27% of the cost for family coverage and 18% for individual coverage, with employers picking up the remainder.

Driving Up Costs

Other groups have recently posted projections of what employers might face next year.

Consulting firm AON, for example, projected employers could pay 9.5% more next year, the fourth consecutive year of big increases, while a similar company, Marsh, estimated 8.2%, the highest jump since 2003. Costs are going up for many reasons, from people utilizing more services to skyrocketing prices of prescription drugs and rapidly rising hospital prices, the reports say.

Also helping drive up costs is artificial intelligence, say other reports, including one from the Business Group on Health, a membership organization of self-insured employers. The report said hospital systems and other medical providers use the technology to maximize insurer and patient billing.

The business group predicted a median premium increase of 9.2% next year, although employers might reduce that by making benefit changes.

Until recently, employers absorbed the lion’s share of cost increases, “but that’s starting to change a bit,” said Jim Winkler, chief strategy officer for the group. “When open enrollment starts, most people will see their out-of-paycheck costs and probably their out-of-pocket costs going up.”

Looking ahead, the group suggests employers take further action to forestall increases in 2028, Winkler said. One idea is to offer lower copayments for some health providers based on their prices or quality, similar to “tiered networks,” a strategy employers and insurers have tried, with only 4% of companies sticking with it, according to the KFF survey. “What’s old is new again,” Winkler noted, saying it might work better now because it’s easier than ever for apps to show consumers the providers with the lowest copayments, which would be set by an employer or insurer.

Overlooked in much of the discussion on rising health costs, said Elizabeth Mitchell, president and CEO of the large employer organization Purchaser Business Group on Health, is the role played by the healthcare industry — from hospitals to drugmakers to insurers.

She asked: Why are the customers — the employers, in this case — being asked what they are doing about it? “The industry is doing absolutely nothing to control costs, as evidenced by the relentless growth in costs,” she said.

Businesses are using new pricing information made available under federal rules to contract directly in some cases with hospitals and other providers and to invest in primary care.

Mitchell and others say Congress should also get involved. Health policy researchers at Georgetown University, for example, suggest capping annual deductibles, setting hospital price caps, and extending lower drug prices negotiated by Medicare to the private sector.

Keeping Costs Flat

Not all companies saw an increase this year.

Take KFF survey respondent Phifer Inc., a company based in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, that makes insect screens and precision woven products, such as outdoor furniture fabric. Its health costs remained flat this year, likely because it has put a strong focus in recent years on providing zero-cost primary care to its workers through on-site clinics and direct contracts with doctors’ offices, said Russell DuBose, the company’s vice president of human resources.

Only 7% of companies in the KFF survey reported having an on-site clinic, although 24% said they had one on-site or nearby.

Workers get in quickly to see a primary care doctor, DuBose said, and that can help with both prevention of disease and catching problems early. The company also directly contracts with other types of specialists.

“We steer plan members to the best providers that we can find,” DuBose said. “When we do that, we’re paying a more reasonable price.”

The company is self-insured, like many employers. That means it pays all the bills itself and buys what’s called stop-loss insurance to help with very high bills. That coverage has also jumped in price, DuBose said.

He often gets calls from other employers asking about his company’s strategy — and how to control costs. Now, far more so than in recent years, he said, employers are nervous, worried about costs continuing to rise and what that would mean.

“The worry is ‘Could the rising cost of healthcare be the next job killer?’” he said.

Among other findings from the annual KFF report:

  • Twenty-nine percent of all companies surveyed said covering GLP-1s, a new class of weight loss drug, had a “significant” effect on their drug costs.
  • Many companies — about 29% of large ones — reported difficulty getting information on how much their plans paid for medical care or price comparisons among providers.
  • About 9% of companies with 50 or more workers buy prescription drugs from outside the U.S. to save money.

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.This article first appeared on KFF Health News and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Millions of Medicare enrollees who buy stand-alone prescription drug plans will see their average monthly premiums rise by 50% in 2027, a new analysis finds. But enrollees can avoid the average increase — from $34 a month to $51 — by switching to lower-cost plans during the program’s open enrollment period, which runs through Dec. 7.
When Ashley Porter began slurring her speech one October day four years ago, doctors suspected a stroke. A spinal tap, an MRI, dozens of blood draws, another MRI, and a night spent at the hospital were followed, finally, by an answer: Porter had multiple sclerosis. Her shock turned to outrage, she said, when she received the roughly $180,000 hospital bill, even though insurance covered most of it. Porter and her husband have insurance through two separate employer plans yet have spent at least $75,000 a year — roughly a quarter of their gross income — on medical expenses since her diagnosis.
What’s scarier than ghosts and goblins? How about measles, unaffordable dental care, and an insurance claim denied by artificial intelligence? Nearly 80 healthcare-themed haikus crept into our inbox this Halloween season. Meet the winners of KFF Health News’ eighth annual Halloween haiku contest below. Follow KFF Health News’ social media accounts (X, Instagram, and Facebook) for more of our favorites. Enjoy! 1st Place (Illustration: Oona Zenda/KFF Health News; Haiku: DJ Zelle) Which is scarier?Jack-o’-lanterns and ghouls, orMeasles and lettuce? — DJ Zelle
Chris McQueen finished treatment for leukemia a year and a half ago, but the ads for fake cures never stopped. Juice cleanses to cure cancer, “natural” cancer treatments, clinics in Mexico promising full recovery with little chemotherapy — all appeared on McQueen’s mobile phone during routine oncologist visits and monthly bloodwork. McQueen and others have taken to social media to vent about companies known as data brokers tracking their whereabouts via their smartphones’ location data, connecting it with other data gathered about them, and then drawing inferences about their health struggles...
The KFF Health News Minute is available every Thursday via direct download or the RSS feed. Oct. 29 Arielle Zionts [arr-ee-ELL ZY-ence] reads the week’s news: Prescription drugs can be lifesavers, but taking many different meds can be risky. Plus, people shopping for Obamacare plans for next year may see some changes. Your browser does not support the audio element. Can’t see the audio player? Visit kffhealthnews.org to listen. Oct. 22
Stephanie Rowell was standing on her parents’ front porch in July when a wasp stung her left arm. She said that almost immediately her arm felt like it was “on fire,” her body started itching all over, and her face became swollen and red. Rowell, 53, took Benadryl, and her father started driving her to the nearest emergency room, about 25 minutes away. But after driving for 10 minutes they spotted a TruHealthNow urgent care facility in Purcellville, Virginia, and decided to stop, hoping she would get help faster. “I thought I was going to die,” she said, recalling that she felt her throat...
PAGE, Ariz. — Doug Herrera still lives in the house his father built, though his dad died some time ago from cancer. Herrera wonders if that illness could have been linked to pollutants from nearby uranium mining. Now, he worries that a possible new neighbor — a proposed $10 billion mega data center — could imperil his health. “I’m a patriot, but I’m highly against the data center,” Herrera, 64, said from his front porch near a yard sign that reads “No Data Centers.” “There is light pollution, sound pollution. The temperature is going to rise,” he said.
CREVE COEUR, Mo. — Reneé Luckfield tries not to knock like a cop. In fact, the 29-year-old spends a lot of time thinking about how to make strangers comfortable when she shows up at their door to talk about transgender healthcare. A syncopated “tap — tap-tap-tap” sounds friendly even when she knocks loudly. In each encounter, she masks her own unease. “Honestly, it’s not something that I’m entirely comfortable with,” Luckfield, a transgender woman, said while walking door to door in this affluent St. Louis suburb. “And it’s not fair that we have to do this work.”
Hospital units dedicated to treating the nation’s sickest kids are disappearing nationwide. In the past year alone, hospitals have closed pediatric intensive care units for critically ill kids in Montana, Oregon, and Missouri. Overnight hospital wings for kids have also shuttered in Illinois and California. Depending on the hospital, pediatric units — which are separate from neonatal intensive care units — can serve patients ranging from a few weeks old to well into their teens or early adulthood. As hospitals look to cut costs, many are converting those beds into more services for newborns...
Karlo Campana is usually outnumbered these days. He has three young kids under age 4. On a recent Saturday, he played a mini game of basketball with his two older kids in their Southern California home, shooting a ball into a hoop on the door, while his baby boy watched from his bouncy chair. Campana took paid time off in May after the birth of his son — just as he did for his daughters. “You need that adjustment period,” he said. Campana, who works at an ad agency, said having the time off not to think about work — or worry about losing income during that time — was crucial for him and his...
This article was produced in partnership with The Trace, a nonprofit newsroom covering gun violence in America. Sign up for its newsletters here.
(Maria Fabrizio for WPLN and KFF Health News) Gina Conley, an Army veteran in Aberdeen, North Carolina, knew she wanted a low-intervention birth for her first child. But her plan started to go off the rails as soon as she got to the hospital. “Everything that I did not want to happen had happened,” she said. “And I just remember that feeling of being just so utterly defeated.” Her cervix wasn’t dilating quickly, and Conley said her midwife insisted that she take Pitocin to speed up the labor. Later, when she was nearly fully dilated, the midwife asked to break Conley’s amniotic fluid sac,...
Dianne Williams said she lost weight and lowered her blood pressure thanks to quarterly doctor appointments, monthly phone calls with a nurse, and a blood pressure cuff she uses at home that transmits data to her care team. “It’s good to have somebody talk to you and tell you what your progress is like. And she’s a very nice person,” Williams said of her nurse. Williams, who lives in rural Georgia, said these services — referred to as remote patient monitoring — encourage her to take her medication and inspired her to revamp her diet and exercise. But many Medicare patients, especially those...
Bill McAdams, a 45-year-old travel nurse from Holiday, Florida, was uninsured last year when he experienced a stroke. He hadn’t been able to afford his agency’s health plan, which would have cost $3,600 monthly to cover him and his wife. The hospital that treated him sent him a bill for $93,000. Janet Marx, 56, of Milford, Connecticut, has doubled up on insurance coverage through her husband’s employer and Medicare because she has lupus and fibromyalgia, disabling chronic conditions. Still the couple sold their home, the house where Marx grew up, to afford the costs of their medical care.
Refugees. Sex-trafficking victims. People fleeing war. They’re among the hundreds of thousands of immigrants living in the country legally who no longer qualify for Medicaid. The change, in effect since Oct. 1, is part of the 2025 Republican tax law, which cuts Medicaid spending by an estimated $900 billion through 2034. KFF Health News rural health reporter Andrew Jones joined WAMU’s Health Hub on Oct. 21 to explain which Medicaid enrollees are affected in the Washington, D.C., region and what other cuts to health services for immigrants are next.
BAKERSFIELD, Calif. — Ulises Hernandez has had health coverage through Medicaid for as long as he can remember. But he had never waited as long for care as he did in September after a dental crown slipped down his throat during a procedure. He spent eight hours in an emergency room waiting for care and more than two days without food. Sitting in his wheelchair to protest looming federal Medicaid cuts outside Republican U.S. Rep. David Valadao’s Bakersfield office, Hernandez described his wait as a foreshadowing of what’s ahead. “I couldn’t eat, I couldn’t drink, I couldn’t do anything, and I...
Consumers who buy Affordable Care Act health insurance are going to see changes both big and small as open enrollment for 2027 coverage kicks off. These include premium increases, possible additional identity checks, potential delays in working with a broker, and new limits on which immigrants can get subsidies. Shoppers need to plan accordingly.
The United States spends a lot of money on healthcare. To better understand how much, who spends it, and what it’s spent on, we dug into the federal government’s data.  In 2024, the most recent year for which data was available, the U.S. spent $5.3 trillion on healthcare. That means an average of more than $14.4 billion was spent each day, and more than $10 million each minute.
Rising healthcare costs aren’t a problem just for those who buy their own health insurance. Increases hit employers and their workers this year, too, and more are expected for 2027 plans — adding to growing concerns about affordability heading into the midterm elections.
Days before it was to go into effect, the Trump administration pushed back a U.S. customs rule threatening the supply of vital prescription drugs imported by millions of Americans. Under the rule, Customs and Border Protection and the FDA will require coding on packages that makes it easier to know what’s in them. It is aimed at collecting tariffs on even low-value imports, and at catching illegal drugs like fentanyl. It will also add costs and complex paperwork to each order. Now the regulation, which was set to start Oct. 22, is delayed until Jan. 20.

 

DISCLAIMER: The information found on this Web Site is dynamic and subject to change. Please use the "CONTACT US" section of the Web Site to submit any questions or comments.